Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Herman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1906No. 14,619PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Osage district court; Robert C. Heizer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In this action William Herman sought to recover damages from the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company for the destruction of personal property which resulted from an overflow of water on his land. He alleged that Switzler creek, a natural watercourse, was negligently bridged by the railroad company; that the bridge was faulty in construction; and that the company in an attempt to strengthen it built a web of supporting timbers underneath it in such a way as to impede the flow of water *78and operate as a dam of the stream. In May,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. CuppySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. City of Kansas City v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broadway Manufacturing Co. v. Leavenworth Terminal Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Riddle v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Clements v. Phœnix Utility Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Thompson v. McDougalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Niccum v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API