Legal Opinion

State v. Jack

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 1, 2018No. 20150901-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAGEN, Judge:

¶1 Defendant Jordan Jeffery Jack was convicted of seven counts of exploitation of a vulnerable adult, third degree felonies, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-111 (LexisNexis 2012), and one count of communications fraud, a second degree felony, see id. § 76-10-1801. 1 Jack appeals, arguing that the trial court should have merged his communications fraud conviction into his exploitation of a vulnerable adult convictions under Utah Code section 76-1-402(3) and the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Utah constitutions. See U.S. Const. amend. V ; Utah Const. art. I, § 12. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  4. State v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Utah State Tax Comm'n v. See's Candies, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Bountiful City v. SischCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  3. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  4. Orem City v. JakemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API