State v. Jack
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
HAGEN, Judge:
¶1 Defendant Jordan Jeffery Jack was convicted of seven counts of exploitation of a vulnerable adult, third degree felonies, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-111 (LexisNexis 2012), and one count of communications fraud, a second degree felony, see id. § 76-10-1801. 1 Jack appeals, arguing that the trial court should have merged his communications fraud conviction into his exploitation of a vulnerable adult convictions under Utah Code section 76-1-402(3) and the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Utah constitutions. See U.S. Const. amend. V ; Utah Const. art. I, § 12. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- State v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Utah State Tax Comm'n v. See's Candies, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
- Bountiful City v. SischCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Orem City v. JakemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025