Legal Opinion

Zedrick v. Kosenski

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1963No. 36313PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Fundamentally, this is an action upon a promissory note executed by defendant and held by plaintiff. There are two other causes of action, in theory, the same as the first. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and entered a judgment of dismissal.

At the center of this case is a single question of law.

October 1, 1957, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written partnership agreement. Their contributions to the partnership were to be equal. Plaintiff contributed the assets of his business, known as “Joe Zedrick Tidewater Oil Co., Distributor”; defendant contributed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Edens v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Pejsa v. BridgesArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hamilton v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Barber v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Wold v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API