Legal Opinion

Carskaddon v. City of South Bend

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1895No. 17,176PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellant, in two paragraphs of complaint, sued the appellee to enforce specific performance of a contract for the purchase, by the appellee from the appellant, of certain real estate. The circuit court sustained appellee’s demurrer to each paragraph of complaint, and that ruling is here urged as error.

From the facts pleaded in each paragraph, it appears that the appellee was contemplating the purchase of a suitable site for a city hall, and a committee of the common council had in view and under consideration several locations, including that of the appellant. On the 24th day of April,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. High v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ShipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Pulse v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Lee v. HillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. ZehendnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Porter v. PattersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Gerardot v. EmenhiserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Neal v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Carr v. City of KissimmeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API