Legal Opinion

In Re the Conditional Use Permit Granted to Van Zanten

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1999No. 20596, 20632Published

1Opinion of the Court

598 N.W.2d 861 (1999)

1999 SD 79

In the Matter of the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED TO Greg VAN ZANTEN for Expansion of An Animal Confinement Operation On Property Located In section 36, Township 105, Range 52, Lake County, South Dakota.

Nos. 20596, 20632.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued January 12, 1999

Decided June 30, 1999.

Mark V. Meierhenry of Danforth, Meierhenry & Meierhenry, Sioux Falls, for appellant Van Zanten.

Chris S. Giles, Lake County State's Atty., Madison, for appellee Lake County.

Tim R. Shattuck and Elizabeth A. Lewis of Woods, Fuller, Shultz & Smith, Sioux Falls, for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. Gte-SwCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Vellinga v. VellingaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re the State & City Sales Tax Liability of Quality Service Railcar Repair Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API