Legal Opinion

Nania v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 19, 1991No. 10423-1-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shields, A.C.J.

The jury found Pacific Northwest Bell's (PNB) negligence was the proximate cause of Debbie Nania's injury. The jury also found both the City of Spokane and Ms. Nania negligent but determined their negligence was not a proximate cause of the injury. From judgment entered on a unanimous verdict, PNB appeals. We affirm.

The jury returned its verdict on a special verdict form as follows:

First page:

We, the jury, make the following answers to the questions submitted by the Court:

1. Was there negligence by Pacific Northwest Bell?

ANSWER: Yes x No_

2. Was the negligence of Pacific…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. PamWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Blue Chelan, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ferrin v. DonnellefeldWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Blasick v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re the Estate of StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. In Re Estate of StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. In re the Marriage of MorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API