Legal Opinion

State v. Pam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1984No. 48781-2PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

Petitioner Isaac Lee Pam challenges a Court of Appeals decision which allows the State to retry him on habitual criminal charges. We reverse. State v. Pam, 31 Wn. App. 692, 644 P.2d 722 (1982).

On May 16, 1980, petitioner was convicted of first degree robbery and second degree assault. These convictions were affirmed in State v. Pam, 98 Wn.2d 748, 659 P.2d 454 (1983). The special weapon findings were vacated, however, and Pam's case was remanded for resentencing.

Following his conviction, the State filed a supplemental information charging Pam as a habitual criminal. The information contained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. PamWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. FortunWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. PamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API