Legal Opinion

State v. Schiller-Munneman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 25, 2015No. 11CR0002; A152061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of first-degree rape, ORS 163.375, raising three assignments of error. At defendant’s trial, over defendant’s objection, the trial court allowed the state to discuss and introduce evidence of text messages that the victim sent to defendant at the police’s request, as well as defendant’s nonresponse to those messages. In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress that evidence, arguing that the state’s use of his silence as substantive evidence at trial violated his right to remain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. SmallwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Schiller-MunnemanOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. Schiller-MunnemanOregon Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API