Deschler v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
The respondent filed suit below to recover insurance benefits under an accidental *98death policy which excludes coverage for death resulting from the use of a “device for aerial navigation.” On opposing motions for summary judgment, the lower court granted judgment in favor of the respondent, thereby holding as a matter of law that the insured, who died in an accident involving a water ski kite, was not using a “device for aerial navigation” within the meaning of the policy’s exclusionary clause. We reverse.
The facts as produced by the parties in support of their opposing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jones v. HinkleUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- O'HARA v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Smith v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Clark v. Lone Star Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Cabell v. World Service Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Totten v. New York Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Adams v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Engel v. Credit Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bradshaw v. BurninghamUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Hanover Insurance v. ShowalterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.