Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Mines
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 9, 1983No. 2782PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This case comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court. We had ordered the defendant discharged for a violation of Rule 1100. 282 Pa.Super. 157, 422 A.2d 876. The Supreme Court, finding no Rule 1100 violation, reversed and remanded the case to this court to decide the remaining issue not previously decided. Commonwealth v. Mines, 502 Pa. 41, 463 A.2d 999 (1983). This issue is whether the trial court improperly restricted the cross-examination of a Commonwealth witness. We hold that the court did not, and therefore affirm.
Appellant was convicted of robbery and conspiracy arising…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commonwealth v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. KatchmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. Benny OngCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. CautoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SimmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. GaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. CobbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.