Commonwealth v. Mines
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*160SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgments of sentence for robbery1 and criminal conspiracy.2 The principal issue is whether appellant should have been discharged under Rule 1100.3
At approximately 10:30 p. m. on September 26, 1977, appellant and one Artie Williams approached a group of people gambling with dice outside a Philadelphia grocery store. Appellant said, “This is a stickup.” (N.T. 116, 126) Williams aimed a sawed off shotgun at them, told them to give up their possessions, and appellant collected the possessions. One of the group, who was a victim of the robbery, managed to run…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. LamonnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HicksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LambSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. LevittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. MinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. TateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.