Legal Opinion
In Re Bartha
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1976No. Crim. 28593PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Petitioner Zsuzsanna Bartha, also known as Z. Budapest, was convicted in Los Angeles Municipal Court of a misdemeanor, violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code section 43.30, fortunetelling. The appellate department of the superior court affirmed the judgment and denied a motion to certify the case to the Court of Appeal pursuant to rule 63 of the California Rules of Court. Contending that the ordinance is unconstitutional, petitioner filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (See In re Zerbe, 60 Cal.2d 666, 667-668 [36 Cal.Rptr. 286, 388 P.2d 182, 10 A.L.R.3d 840].)
Petit…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Follett v. Town of McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spiritual Psychic Science Church of Truth, Inc. v. City of AzusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- NEFEDRO v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- People v. ProctorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- NEFEDRO v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- NEFEDRO v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.