NEFEDRO v. Montgomery County
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentHarrell, J.
I dissent from the reasoning and conclusion reached in the Majority Opinion, namely, that Montgomery County Code § 32-71 (the “Fortunetelling Ordinance”), which prohibits generally persons from demanding or accepting any remuneration or gratuity for forecasting or foretelling, or pretending to forecast or foretell, the future by cards, palm reading, or any other scheme, practice, or device, represents an unconstitutional restriction upon the Appellant’s, Nick Nefedro’s, right to freedom of speech in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 40 of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.