Legal Opinion

Stringham v. Union County People's Utility District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1948PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, C. J.

These three causes are before us upon motions filed by the respondents in each of the causes to strike from our files the abstracts of record submitted in the three causes on the ground that matter has been inserted in each of the abstracts which is not a part of the circuit court’s records. The respondents move in the alternative that there be deleted from each of the abstracts of record the improper material. The latter is the same in each of the three abstracts and consists of correspondence.

Rule 9 of this court (9 O. C. L. A. 320) says:

it# # # The appellant shall serve upon the attorney…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Redick v. Peony ParkNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Vermont Department of Public Service v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Oregon School Activities Ass'n v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Gurdane v. Northern Wasco County Peoples' Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API