Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harrison v. Lakey Foundry Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1960No. Docket 47, Calendar 48,672Published

1DissentSmith, J.

The defendant Lakey -Foundry Corporation has phrased the question well. It is as follows:

“We know of no greater disability than total dis- . ability and we do not believe there can be any greater *680form of disability than total disability. The way we ■understand plaintiff’s contentions is that he had concurring total disabilities. The statute (CL 1948, § 412.9 [Stat Ann 1947 Cum Supp § 17.159]) speaks of total incapacity for work resulting from the injury and there is an admitted holding by the appeal board that plaintiff was totally disabled from the May, 1949, injury. This total disability…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Hebert v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. O'Brien v. Albert A. Albrecht Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Van Treeck v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API