Legal Opinion

Zink v. Zink

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1964No. 40332PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

This appeal and cross-appeal concern a judgment rendered in a divorce action. The plaintiff in error, husband, in his appeal, contends the amount of alimony, child support and attorney’s fees awarded to the defendant in error, the wife, is excessive. On the other hand, the wife, in her cross-appeal, contends the amount awarded as and for division of jointly acquired property, alimony, child support and attorney’s fees is wholly inadequate.

DECREE OF DIVORCE AND JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

The trial court found in the Decree of Divorce and Journal Entry of Judgment that the parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smyth v. SmythSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. McElreath v. McElreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Hurt v. HurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Wendel v. WendelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diment v. DimentCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Peyravy v. PeyravySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API