Legal Opinion

Diment v. Diment

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1974No. 47060PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROMANG, Judge:

On February 6, 1970, the plaintiff, Patricia Jeanne Diment, was granted a divorce from the defendant, Dean Henry Diment, on the ground of incompatibility. The Divorce Decree reads in pertinent part as follows:

“That there is no property, real, personal or mixed, to be subject to division between the parties;
“That defendant should be required to pay plaintiff a sum certain by way of permanent alimony, and, further, that
“IT IS THE FURTHER ORDER, JUDGMENT AND DECREE of the court that defendant pay to plaintiff in permanent alimony the sum of $39,600.-00, to be paid in 132…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Mathews v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Moseley v. MoseleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Wilbanks v. WilbanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Shea v. SheaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. DeWitt v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. In Re James Wilbur Cox, Sr., Bankrupt. Rhea Nita Cox, Now York v. James Wilbur Cox, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  5. Isenhower v. IsenhowerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API