Bell v. Western River Imp. & Wrecking Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 25 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL EROJI LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. cited 1 B. Mon., 73; Civil Code, sec. 276. • cited 2 Met., 214; McKee vs. Pope, 18 B. Mon.; 1 & lb., 557; Civil Code, sections 273,274,276, 280 ; 1 B. Mon., 73; Brennan vs. Black, 5 Dana. cited 2 Story’s Eg. Pleading, sec. 408, a; Civil Code, sec. 800; Civil Code, sub-div. 2 of art. 3 ; lb., sections 273, 276, 283, 284, 254, 235, 268, 239, 810; 4 Bibb, 336; lb., 508; Bustard vs. Gates, ¿pc., 4 Dana.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE DUVALL
delivered the opinion op the court :
S. Parker & Son, and J. L. Beeler, owners of the steamboat “Antelope,” executed two deeds of trust on the boat to secure two bills of exchange drawn by the owners, and accepted by Brown., the captain of the boat, in favor of the appellees. /
The appellees filed their petition in the Louisville chancery court, against the steamboat “Antelope” and owners, and the other parties to the bills of exchange, and deeds of trust, alleging that their debts were unpaid ; that the defendants were all non-residents of Kentucky ; that the “Antelope” was then…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Renier v. HurlbutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- National Bank of Commerce v. HuntingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Boston Investment Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Balk v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.