Balk v. . Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
PetitxoN to Reheae case reported in 122 N. C., 64.
1Opinion of the CourtClaRK, J.
This is a petition to rehear the decision reported in 122 N. C., 64. The judgment of another Sraie condemning the debt due by Harris to Balk can only be recognized as valid here when that Court acquired jurisdiction. It was not founded on personal service, but it is contended that the Maryland Court acquired jurisdiction by attaching the debt due Balk by serving notice upon Harris, who was transiently in the city of Ra'Cniore. The situs of the debe for purposes of taxation, and usually for all purposes, is with the creditor. But there are many States whose Courts hold that for the purposes of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tingley v. BatemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Den v. HuffTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
- Farmers & Citizens' Bank v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Winfree v. . BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goodwin v. ClaytorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Goodwin v. . ClaytorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Hunt v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- State v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Balk v. Harris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.