Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Popp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1925No. Appeal 31PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

There are two assignments of error. The first charges the court with error in refusing the defendant’s motion at the close of the Commonwealth’s case, to the effect that the court direct a verdict for the defendants. This motion was overruled. The trial judge cannot be required to entertain a motion to direct a verdict of acquittal until the conclusion of all the testimony. This matter was fully discussed in Commonwealth v. Sonis and Sonis, 81 Superior Ct. 205, by our Brother Porter, now President Judge, and it will not be necessary to repeat what was there said.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SouderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. DeibertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Commonwealth v. SamsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth v. SalkeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API