Commonwealth v. Popp
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
There are two assignments of error. The first charges the court with error in refusing the defendant’s motion at the close of the Commonwealth’s case, to the effect that the court direct a verdict for the defendants. This motion was overruled. The trial judge cannot be required to entertain a motion to direct a verdict of acquittal until the conclusion of all the testimony. This matter was fully discussed in Commonwealth v. Sonis and Sonis, 81 Superior Ct. 205, by our Brother Porter, now President Judge, and it will not be necessary to repeat what was there said.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SouderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. DeibertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Commonwealth v. SamsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. SalkeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958