Commonwealth v. Deibert
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The appellant, Deibert, was convicted of the larceny of a motor bus, from the prosecutor, Hardy. Appellant was a distributor of Stewart trucks, and entered into a written contract with the prosecutor to sell him a truck with a bus body, to be specially made according to the latter’s directions, for $3100, of which $300 was to be paid — and was paid — at the signing of the agreement on June 4,1931. The contract, although in writing, is not printed as part of the record and therefore we do not know its precise terms. But both parties to it agree that there was a sale of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frech v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Commonwealth v. RomesburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Scott v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
- Welsh v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Commonwealth v. NathanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. WhitingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. OttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Commonwealth ex rel. Perry v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commercial Inv. Trust Co. v. MinonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.