Legal Opinion
Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable Perez
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 2014No. A12-2118PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This proceeding arises from a complaint filed by the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards (“Board”) against the Honorable George W. Perez, former judge of the Minnesota Tax Court, alleging violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and Minnesota law. Following a hearing, a three-member panel (“Panel”) found that Judge Perez failed to issue decisions in a timely manner, made false certifications, and made false statements in his decisions, in violation of MinmStat. § 271.20 (2012), Rules 1.1 and 1.2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and Canons 2A and 3A(1) of the 2008 Code of Judicial…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Complaint Concerning MieraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Complaint Concerning WintonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Inquiry Into the CONDUCT OF the Honorable Alan F. PENDLETONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Inquiry Into the CONDUCT OF the Honorable Alan F. PENDLETONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015