Legal Opinion
Patricia A.M. v. Eugene W.M.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosalie S. Bailey, J.
The parties were divorced by judgment granted on July 24, 1991. That judgment incorporated, but did not merge, an oral stipulation placed on the record that same day. That stipulation contained the following language:
“There are pensions in the possession of the parties, there will be qualified domestic relation[s] orders submitted by the parties to the respective pension holders, and the pension periods will be from the date of the marriage which is 9-29-67 to *1014January 30, 1989. And the pension plans will be split according to the ruling in Majauskas.”
De…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Skrodelis v. NorbergsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Duhamel v. DuhamelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Brooks v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Medalie v. JacobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bayen v. BayenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Woronoff v. WoronoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bielecki v. BieleckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Bielecki v. BieleckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Blomdahl v. BlomdahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.