Legal Opinion

Duhamel v. Duhamel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 2004No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), entered July 3, 2001. The order denied defendant’s motion for a declaration that plaintiffs application for the execution of a qualified domestic relations order is time-barred and granted plaintiffs application.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985 [1990]). Present—Green, J.E, Scudder, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bayen v. BayenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. McQuade v. McQuadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Berardi v. BerardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Denaro v. DenaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Woronoff v. WoronoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API