Legal Opinion
Beechwood Music Corporation v. Vee Jay Records, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
This matter came on to be heard on the motion of plaintiffs Beachwood Music Corporation (“BMC”) and Ardmore & Beechwood, Limited (“Ardmore”) for a preliminary injunction against the defendants Vee Jay Records, Inc. (“Vee Jay”) and Málveme Distributors, Inc. (“Málveme”). The court, after having duly considered the verified complaint, the answer, affidavits, memoranda of law, and other documents submitted in connection with the plaintiffs’ motion makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff Ardmore is a joint stock company…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Code Co. v. BensingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Ferris v. FrohmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Capitol Records, Inc. v. Mercury Records CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Rushton v. VitaleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Famous Music Corporation v. Seeco Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sebastian International, Inc. v. Consumer Contact (PTY) Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- De Bardossy v. PuskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- State v. WinsettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1964
- Grove Press, Inc. v. GREENLEAF PUBLISHING COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1965