Rushton v. Vitale
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are suing to enjoin the infringement of a copyright, issued May 10, 1954, on a doll in the form of a chimpanzee named Zippy. This toy has been marketed by them, after a considerable expenditure of time, effort, and money, to fulfill a seasonal demand created by the Howdy Doody television program, on which a chimpanzee named Zippy appears. Despite the fact that defendants’ doll is substantially identical to, and was obviously copied from, that of plaintiffs, the judge below refused to grant a preliminary injunction before full trial. His memorandum of decision…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- American Code Co. v. BensingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Houghton Mifflin Co. v. Stackpole Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corporation and Richard A. HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Imperial Homes Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. Michael M. Lamont and Mrs. Michael M. Lamont, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Tennessee Fabricating Company, D/B/A Tfc Co. v. Moultrie Manufacturing Company and William E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Carling O'Keefe Breweries of Canada, Ltd.District Court, W.D. New York · 1978
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Acadia CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.