Legal Opinion

Foster v. Foster

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1984No. 7209PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

This appeal is taken from the superior court’s grant of a Civil Rule 60(b) motion. In granting the motion, the court modified certain provisions of a decree it had previously entered relating to the division of the parties’ real property. We hold that the superior court did not abuse its discretion in granting the Rule 60(b) motion.1

The marriage of Charles and Sherrie Foster was terminated by dissolution upon their joint petition. The original petition for dissolution provided, as to the parties’ residence, that:

The Husband agrees to give 50% of the profits of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. O'Link v. O'LinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Gravel v. Alaskan Village, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Northern Lights Motel, Inc. v. SweaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Clauson v. ClausonAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lowe v. LoweAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lacher v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wood v. CollinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API