Legal Opinion

State v. Bonilla

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 2011No. 49A02-1102-PC-144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Jaime Bonilla pled guilty to theft in 2005, and in 2010 he sought and was granted post-conviction relief on the ground his counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that his guilty plea might have immigration-related consequences. We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Bonilla entered a plea of guilty to Class A misdemeanor theft.1 He later sought post-conviction relief, alleging his trial counsel was ineffective because counsel did not advise Bonilla of the adverse immigration consequences of his guilty plea. Bon-illa testified he would not have entered the plea if…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. EilandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alex Carrillo v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Bobadilla v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Angelo Bobadilla v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API