State v. Bonilla
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Jaime Bonilla pled guilty to theft in 2005, and in 2010 he sought and was granted post-conviction relief on the ground his counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that his guilty plea might have immigration-related consequences. We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Bonilla entered a plea of guilty to Class A misdemeanor theft.1 He later sought post-conviction relief, alleging his trial counsel was ineffective because counsel did not advise Bonilla of the adverse immigration consequences of his guilty plea. Bon-illa testified he would not have entered the plea if…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. EilandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alex Carrillo v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bobadilla v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Angelo Bobadilla v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018