Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1994No. 49A05-9310-PC-391PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

Clifford Williams, Glen Barker, and Michael Whyte appeal the denial of their petitions for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Williams, Barker, and Whyte (collectively, the petitioners) present three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as

1. whether the petitioners submitted their guilty pleas knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily when the trial court did not advise them in the plea proceeding of the possibility of deportation; and

2. whether the petitioners received the effective assistance of counsel.

The facts most favorable to the judgment are as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Charles Jideonwo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Angelo Bobadilla v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. Tuan Quoc NguyenHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API