Legal Opinion

Bell v. Norris

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2009No. 07-3432PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

In this habeas case involving two consecutive sentences of life imprisonment for a minor, the question we face is whether the Arkansas Supreme Court identified and reasonably applied the correct legal standard for assessing whether the minor made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his Miranda rights. The district court 1 determined that the Arkansas Supreme Court correctly identified a “totality-of-the-circumstances test” as the governing legal standard and applied the test in a reasonable manner. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

Bell, an Arkansas inmate,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kenneth Gray v. Jeff NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Deshawn Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Jordan v. EppsDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2010
  4. Escobedo v. LundDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
  5. Grass v. ReitzDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API