Bell v. Norris
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
In this habeas case involving two consecutive sentences of life imprisonment for a minor, the question we face is whether the Arkansas Supreme Court identified and reasonably applied the correct legal standard for assessing whether the minor made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his Miranda rights. The district court 1 determined that the Arkansas Supreme Court correctly identified a “totality-of-the-circumstances test” as the governing legal standard and applied the test in a reasonable manner. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
Bell, an Arkansas inmate,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kenneth Gray v. Jeff NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Deshawn Fletcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Jordan v. EppsDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2010
- Escobedo v. LundDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- Grass v. ReitzDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.