North Dakota Fair Housing Council, Inc. v. Peterson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] In 1999, an unmarried couple tried to rent from David and Mary Peterson. The Petersons refused because the unmarried couple were seeking to cohabit. The North Dakota Fair Housing Council (“Housing Council”) and Robert and Patricia Kippen — the unmarried couple, who had since married — sued, claiming housing discrimination in violation of the North Dakota Human Rights Act. They appeal the summary judgment dismissing their claims. We affirm, concluding the Peter-sons lawfully refused to rent to the unmarried couple seeking to cohabit.
I
[¶ 2] On March 8, 1999, Robert…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Miller v. C a Muer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. Gamble Skogmo, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Attorney General v. DesiletsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Riemers v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Roe v. DoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Great Western Bank v. Willmar Poultry Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.