Legal Opinion

State v. Gamble Skogmo, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1966No. Cr. 339PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Judge.

In this casé the defendant, Gamble Skog-mo, Inc., also known as Tempo Stores Corporation, was charged with the offense of Sabbath breaking under §§ 12-02-04, 12 — 21— 15, and 12-21-16, N.D.C.C. Trial was before the County Judge with Increased Jurisdiction of Ward County, the defendant having waived a jury.

As the defendant is commonly known and advertises as Tempo, we shall hereafter refer to it by that name.

The essential facts are not in dispute. In the December 4, 1965, issue of the Minot Daily News, Tempo placed a large advertisement encompassing approximately two-thirds of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. JohannesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Best Products Co., Inc. v. SpaethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hjelle v. Sornsin Construction CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API