Legal Opinion

Harlan v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided August 27, 1998No. 12-97-00188-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMEY, Chief Justice.

Booker T. Harlan (“Appellant”) pled guilty to the offense of driving while intoxicated when the trial court denied his motion to set aside the information because of the alleged violation by the State of his right to a speedy trial. Nearly four and one-half years elapsed between the time of his arrest and the date the case finally went to trial. Appellant raises one point of error, alleging that the State violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We will affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Appellant was arrested for the crime of driving while intoxicated on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  2. Mabra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  3. State v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  4. Dokter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  5. Nigel Pinnock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API