Legal Opinion

Nigel Pinnock v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 3, 2003No. 13-01-00397-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice DORSEY (Retired).

Appellant, Nigel Pinnock, without a plea bargain, pleaded guilty to possession of marihuana pursuant to an agreement with the State to work as a confidential informant. After the plea the trial court postponed the punishment hearing, and appel lant began work as an informant. The agreement stated that if he abided by the terms of the agreement the State would recommend deferred adjudication community supervision. If he failed to satisfy the agreement the State would recommend a cap of fifteen years in prison. At the punishment hearing Sargent Jalufka…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Garcia v. DialCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dokter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  2. James Rene Hayes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  3. Justin Allen Dokter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  4. Justin Allen Dokter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API