Legal Opinion

Mabra v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 9, 1999No. 07-98-0193-CRPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHIL JOHNSON, Justice.

David Scott Mabra was convicted by a jury of burglary of a habitation. After pleading true to the enhancement paragraph, he was sentenced by the trial court to 15 years confinement. By three points of error, appellant contends that the evidence in support of his conviction was insufficient as a matter of law, that the court erred in not granting his motion for new trial because the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish guilt without a parties charge, and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dis miss because his constitutional right to a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Ingram v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
  2. Russell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  3. Dokter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  4. Dimas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API