Legal Opinion

Roos v. Consumers Public Power District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1961No. 34861PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The plaintiffs brought separate actions for property damages sustained because of the negligence of the defendant in not properly maintaining its electric lines and in failing to properly inspect such lines and discover the defects therein which resulted in the plaintiffs’ injuries. A verdict was returned by the jury for each of the plaintiffs. The defendant has appealed. The two cases were consolidated for trial in the district court and for the purpose of appeal to this court.

The plaintiffs Roos are the owners of a two-story hotel building and a one-story office building in Gibbon,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Beresford v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Scott v. Claiborne Electric CooperativeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co. v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chart v. DvorakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ramos v. Autoridad de Fuentes Fluviales de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. Erickson v. Monarch Industries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tiede v. Loup Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Rodgers v. Chimney Rock Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API