Legal Opinion

Chart v. Dvorak

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1973No. 308PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Three issues are presented by this appeal:

1. Are appellants Dvorak and Yarekois proper parties defendant?

2. If, as a matter of law, a highway warning sign located in conformance with the state highway commission’s directives is reasonable, is there nevertheless a question of fact concerning the placement of that sign so that the trial court properly denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment ?

3. May appellants be properly proceeded against for a highway warning sign which was improperly placed by their staff?

Proper parties defendant.

Appellants first argue that they are the wrong parties,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Raisanen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Forseth v. SweetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Monfils v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API