Chart v. Dvorak
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Three issues are presented by this appeal:
1. Are appellants Dvorak and Yarekois proper parties defendant?
2. If, as a matter of law, a highway warning sign located in conformance with the state highway commission’s directives is reasonable, is there nevertheless a question of fact concerning the placement of that sign so that the trial court properly denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment ?
3. May appellants be properly proceeded against for a highway warning sign which was improperly placed by their staff?
Proper parties defendant.
Appellants first argue that they are the wrong parties,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Raisanen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Forseth v. SweetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Monfils v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.