Commonwealth v. Layne
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The question raised by the defendant’s appeal is whether the trial judge, by an order entered on April 4, 1986, acted properly under Mass.R.Crim.P. 42, 378 Mass. 919 (1979), to correct a clerical mistake in the record of a sentence he had imposed on the defendant on December 24, 1982, on Suffolk indictment no. 038513 or whether the judge, acting in light of subsequent events, has attempted an untimely exercise of the separate and distinct power to revise sentences which is now found in Mass.R.Crim.P. 29(a), 378 Mass. 899 (1979). See Bolduc v. Commissioner of Correction, 355 Mass. 765, 767…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aldoupolis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. LayneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Henschel v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Bolduc v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Commonwealth v. LayneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tucher v. Brothers Auto Salvage Yard, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- WolcottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. BarriereMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ClarkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.