Steiner v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Elizabeth A. Steiner appeals the trial court's denial of her Motion to Terminate Pretrial Urine Drug Sereens. Specifically, Steiner argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it imposed random drug sereens as a condition of her bail. Because the Indiana statute governing conditions of bail only allows for the imposition of reasonable restrictions designed to assure the defendant's presence in court or the physical safety of another person or the community and there was no individualized determination made by the court that Steiner would use drugs…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Tyrone G. Berry v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- State v. UllringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Oliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Lee ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Raymond Lee ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Berry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Rea Robinson v. Radley RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Steiner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.