Legal Opinion

In Re York

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1995No. S032327PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether, in making the decision to release an accused from custody on his or her own recognizance (OR) prior to judgment, a court or magistrate may condition such release upon the defendant’s agreement to submit to random drug testing and warrantless search and seizure during that period. Petitioners maintain that the imposition of such conditions is not permitted by the statutory provision governing OR release, and, in any event, violates various constitutional guarantees.

For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that neither…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond Lee ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. StandishCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Simon v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API