Legal Opinion
Oliver v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 1996No. 95-CO-434PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Edwin T. Oliver challenges his criminal contempt 1 conviction, contending that the trial court erred in considering test results showing that he had violated the court’s order to refrain from illegal drug use while on pretrial release. In particular, he contends that his motion to suppress the drug test results should have been granted on either of two grounds: (1) pretrial drug testing is not a statutorily permissible condition of release pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-1321 (1996 Repl.); or (2) mandatory pretrial drug testing is an unreasonable search and seizure in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Lee ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- State v. UllringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Baker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Steiner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.