Krenek v. Texstar North America, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
This appeal involves an application of the common law “strip and gore” doctrine. Appellants, Victor Krenek and Dorothy Mae Charbula, brought suit against appel-lee, Texstar North America, Inc., alleging that Texstar’s oil well drained their land. The trial court granted Texstar’s motion for summary judgment, finding that appellants had no mineral interest in the drained strip of land. Appellants bring three points of error. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Joe and Louise Krenek, appellants’ parents, owned a 236 acre tract of land in Wharton County, Texas. On March…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hyundai Motor Co. v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- C.M. Asfahl Agency v. Tensor Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
- Acker v. Denton Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Reagan v. Marathon Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Alvarado v. Hyundai Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.