Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Baer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1996No. 290PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether evidence of the mailing by the Department of Transportation of notice of the suspension of an appellant’s operator’s license and the admission by the appellant of having received, and possibly read such notice, is sufficient to prove “actual notice” and thereby support a conviction pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1543(a), despite the appellant’s claims of lack of understanding or mental competency at the time of receipt of notice. We hold that there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. ZimmickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VetriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HeidlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. BrewingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Com v. Adaire, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API