Moore v. Terry
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appellee claims an undivided one-eleventh interest in lands of Charles Moore, deceased, by virtue of her claim of inheritance as his child, and the circuit court so decreed.
There is a controversy as to whether she was his child. There is no question but that appellant was a son of the deceased Moore, and has purchased the interest of all the heirs of deceased, other than appellee. The evidence- for appellee shows that Charles and Millie Moore (colored' were married February 13, 1870, and -that appellee was born of Millie several months (three or four) thereafter (some say in September), and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lingen v. LingenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
- Lay v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- McBride v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Foster v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Butler v. Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Everage v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Blackmon v. BrazilSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Stone v. Gulf American Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Howard v. PikeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Hudson v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.