Legal Opinion

Moore v. Terry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1929No. 4 Div. 425PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Appellee claims an undivided one-eleventh interest in lands of Charles Moore, deceased, by virtue of her claim of inheritance as his child, and the circuit court so decreed.

There is a controversy as to whether she was his child. There is no question but that appellant was a son of the deceased Moore, and has purchased the interest of all the heirs of deceased, other than appellee. The evidence- for appellee shows that Charles and Millie Moore (colored' were married February 13, 1870, and -that appellee was born of Millie several months (three or four) thereafter (some say in September), and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lingen v. LingenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
  2. Lay v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. McBride v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Foster v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Butler v. Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Everage v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Blackmon v. BrazilSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Stone v. Gulf American Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Howard v. PikeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Hudson v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API