Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Principal Financial Group

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 3, 1990No. 88-834, 88-925PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barbara Caroline Thomas sued Principal Financial Group, d/b/a Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company ("Principal Mutual"), seeking damages for breach of contract and bad faith refusal to pay insurance benefits. At trial, Ms. Thomas's motion for a directed verdict on the contract claim and Principal Mutual's motion for a directed verdict on both claims were denied and the case was submitted to a jury, which awarded Ms. Thomas $1,000 on her breach of contract claim and $750,000 on her bad faith claim. The trial court entered a judgment on that verdict. Principal Mutual moved for a judgment…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. EMPLOYEES'BENEFIT ASS'N v. GrissettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Acceptance Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Reuter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API