Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Buehler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1989No. 54687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff filed suit in Warren County against his appointed counsel and against the State Public Defender, claiming intentional failure to prosecute his Rule 27.26 motion and requesting appointment of new counsel, monetary damages and costs. The circuit court judge dismissed the petition after finding it “to be totally frivolous and malicious” and finding improper venue. Plaintiff subsequently submitted a notice of appeal to this court along with a copy of an application, directed to the Circuit Court, to proceed with the appeal in forma pauperis. § 514.040, RSMo 1986.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SchmidtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Lee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Berry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. HansonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Hausknect v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  3. Luster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API