Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Siloam Springs Nursing & Rehabilitation
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.
This case involves the interpretation of a Medicaid reimbursement rule promulgated by the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) in 2001. Under the rule, a long-term care facility/Medicaid provider would be reimbursed for its services based upon a number of cost factors, including the fair rental value of its facility. Appellee Siloam Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation (Siloam) asked DHS to interpret the rule so that Siloam’s pre-2001 renovations were considered in determining its fair rental value. DHS declined to do so, and its interpretation was upheld by a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board v. OudinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Burlington Industries v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation Commission v. City of BentonvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. SchroderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Johnson v. Arkansas Board of Examiners in PsychologySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.