Legal Opinion

Bryant v. . Carrier

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDbviN, J.

The appellants’ principal assignments of error relate to the rulings of the court below on matters of evidence and to his charge to the jury.

The exceptions to the admission of the testimony of a witness that he had arrested the defendant for some misdemeanor, and of another that the defendant had been tried in this court, cannot be sustained. One of the issues in the case involved the question of the mental capacity of defendant Carrier, in order to determine his liability for punitive damages. It was alleged in the answer that he was non compos mentis, and it was admitted on the trial that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Cottle v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In Re Will of BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Vogel v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Edwards v. StillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API