Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. Atencio
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1979No. 78-717PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULAND, Judge.
Defendant, Colorado Department of Social Services and its executive director, Armando Atencio, appeal from a judgment that certified plaintiffs’ suit as a class action pursuant to C.R.C.P. 23, invalidated a Department regulation, ordered retroactive home care allowance benefits to plaintiffs Rodgers and Cloud, and barred the Department from denying plaintiffs and all class members from receiving future home care allowances. Plaintiffs, as representatives of the class, cross-appeal the denial of retroactive benefits for all class members. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phillips v. KlassenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- BIG TOP, INCORPORATED v. SchooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Flavell v. Department of WelfareSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- City and County of Denver v. GibsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Burciaga v. SheaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Colorado Department of Social Services v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Dodge v. Department of Social ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kuhn v. State Dept. of Revenue of State of Colo.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Adams v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.