Legal Opinion
Mission Insurance v. Nethers
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 4, 1978No. 2 CA-CIV 2644PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Chief Judge.
This appeal involves interpretation of two separate policies of professional liability insurance issued in California to a Bakersfield law firm, Chain, Younger, Cooney, Jame-son, Lemucchi and Busacca. Plaintiff Jack Nethers in his action for legal malpractice joined as defendants the two insurers, Reserve Insurance Company and Mission Insurance Company, and sought a declaration of rights under their respective policies. The defendant lawyers by cross-claim asked for indemnification by one or both insurance companies for the amount of any judgment rendered in favor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Gyler v. Mission InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Harbor Insurance v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Reserve Insurance Company v. StaatsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Zuckerman v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
- Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. AndersenArizona Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.